"PUBLIC" CHOICE AND COOPERATION IN N-PERSON PRISONER'S DILEMMAFOX J; GUYER M.1978; J. CONFLICT REDUCT.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 22; NO 3; PP. 469-481; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

COMPUTERSIMULIERTE GEGENSPIELER UND UNTERSCHIEDLICHE SPIELSITUATIONEN IN EINEM NICHTNULLSUMMEN-SPIEL. = ADVERSAIRE SIMULE PAR ORDINATEUR ET SITUATIONS DIFFERENCIEES DANS UN JEU-LES-SOMMES-N'EGALANT-PAS-ZEROFITTING U; REVENSTORF D; GRUDE W et al.1976; Z. EXPER. ANGEW. PSYCHOL.; DTSCH.; DA. 1976; VOL. 23; NO 3; PP. 396-412; ABS. ANGL. FR.; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

CONCILIATORY STRATEGIES AND RELATIVE POWERLINDSKOLD S; ARONOFF JR.1980; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 16; NO 2; PP. 187-198; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

COOPERATIVE CHOICE IN THE N-PERSON DILEMMA SITUATIONKOMORITA SS; SWEENEY J; KRAVITZ DA et al.1980; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 38; NO 3; PP. 504-516; BIBL. 31 REF.Article

COOPERATION IN THE DECOMPOSED PRISONER'S DILEMMA GAME. A QUESTION OF REVEALING OR CONCEALING INFORMATION.PINCUS J; BIXENSTINE VE.1977; J. CONFLICT RESOLUT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 21; NO 3; PP. 519-530; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

EFFECTIVE CHOICE IN THE PRISONER'S DILEMMAAXELROD R.1980; J. CONFLICT RESOLUT.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 24; NO 1; PP. 3-26Article

MAKING TRUST EASIER AND HARDER THROUGH TWO FORMS OF SEQUENTIAL INTERACTIONBRICKMAN P; BECKER LJ; CASTLE S et al.1979; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 37; NO 4; PP. 515-521; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

COOPERATION AND THE USE OF COERCION BY GROUPS AND INDIVIDUALS.LINDSKOLD S; MCELWAIN DC; WAYNER M et al.1977; J. CONFLICT RESOLUT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 21; NO 3; PP. 531-550; BIBL. 1 P.Article

PERSONALITY PATTERNS RELATED TO OWN-, JOINT-, AND RELATIVE-GAIN MAXIMIZING BEHAVIORS.BENNETT RP; CARBONARI JP.1976; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 34; NO 6; PP. 1127-1134; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

STATUS AND BEHAVIOR IN THE REITERATED PRISONER'S DILEMMA GAME.MACK D.1976; PSYCHOL. REC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 26; NO 4; PP. 529-532; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

A MODEL OF THE N-PERSON DILEMMA-TYPE GAME.KOMORITA SS.1976; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 12; NO 4; PP. 357-373; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

ENTSCHEIDUNGSVERHALTEN SCHIZOPHRENER UNTER VARIIERTEN PARTNER- UND KOMMUNIKATIONSBEDINGUNGEN IN EINEM ZWEI-PERSONEN NICHT-NULLSUMMEN SPIEL. = COMPORTEMENTS SIGNIFICATIFS DE SCHIZOPHRENE DANS LE JEU-DUEL-LA-SOMME-N'ETANT-PAS-EGALE-A-ZERO SOUS DIFFERENTES CONDITIONS DE COMMUNICATION ET DE PARTENAIREDORNETTE W.1975; ARCH. PSYCHOL.; DTSCH.; DA. 1975; VOL. 127; NO 3-4; PP. 251-270; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

MORE EFFECTIVE CHOICE IN THE PRISONER'S DILEMMAAXELROD R.1980; J. CONFLICT RESOLUT.; ISSN 0022-0027; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 24; NO 3; PP. 379-403; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

BEHAVIORAL SIMILARITY, CONFEDERATE STRATEGY, AND SEX COMPOSITION OF DYAD AS DETERMINANTS OF INTERPERSONAL JUDGMENTS AND BEHAVIOR IN THE PRISONER'S DILEMMA GAMEKNIGHT GP.1980; J. RES. PERSONALITY; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 14; NO 1; PP. 91-103; BIBL. 2 P.Article

ANALYSE EINES INFORMATIONSBEDARFS IN EINEM MODIFIZIERTEN PRISONERS DILEMMA GAME = ANALYSE DES BESOINS D'INFORMATION DANS UNE FORME MODIFIEE DU JEU DU DILEMME PRISONNIERHUSSY W.1979; Z. EXPER. ANGEW. PSYCHOL.; DEU; DA. 1979; VOL. 26; NO 4; PP. 561-572; ABS. ENG/FRE; BIBL. 2 P.Article

TRIANGLE EFFECT AND THE CONNOTATIVE MEANING OF TRUST IN PRISONER'S DILEMMA: A CROSS CULTURAL STUDYSASI MISRA; AMAR KALRO.1979; INT. J. PSYCHOL.; NLD; DA. 1979; VOL. 14; NO 4; PP. 255-263; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

SPIELVERHALTEN IN ABHAENGIGKEIT VON INFORMATIONSART UND RISIKOHOEHE IN EINEM ALTERNIEREND SEQUENTIELLEN 2X2-SPIEL = CONDUITES DE JEU EN RAPPORT AVEC LE MODE D'INFORMATION ET LE DEGRE DE RISQUE DANS UN JEU 2X2 SEQUENTIEL ALTERNANTHUSSY W.1979; ARCH. PSYCHOL.; DEU; DA. 1979; VOL. 132; NO 1; PP. 49-62; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 30 REF.Article

COMMITMENT TO FUTURE INTERACTION AND RELATIVE POWER UNDER CONDITIONS OF INTERDEPENDENCESLUSHER EA; ROSE GL; ROERING KJ et al.1978; J. CONFLICT RESOLUT.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 282-298; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

SUPERIORITY OF VICARIOUS OVER DIRECT EXPERIENCE IN INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT RESOLUTION.BRAVER SL; ROHRER V.1978; J. CONFLICT RESOLUT; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 22; NO 1; PP. 143-155; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

The structure of moral action: a hermeneutic study of moral conflictPACKER, M. J.Contributions to human development. 1985, Vol 13, issn 0301-4193, 158 p.Serial Issue

The value of information in Newcomb's problem and the prisoner's dilemmaSNOW, P.Theory and decision. 1985, Vol 18, Num 2, pp 129-133, issn 0040-5833Article

ASSUMPTIONS OF HUMAN NATURE, AND INITIAL EXPECTATIONS AND BEHAVIOR AS MEDIATROS OF SEX EFFECTS IN PRISONER'S DILEMMA RESEARCHLACY WB.1978; J. CONFLICT RESOLUT.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 269-281; BIBL. 31 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF REPRESSION-SENSITIZATION ON RESPONSE LATENCY IN A PRISONER'S DILEMMA GAME.COLLINS FL JR.1977; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 41; NO 1; PP. 202; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

COGNITIVE FACTORS AND COOPERATION IN THE PRISONER'S DILEMMA GAMEPINCUS J; BIXENSTINE VE.1979; PSYCHOL. REC.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 29; NO 4; PP. 463-471; BIBL. 1 P.Article

Effects of first impressions and reliability of promises on trust and cooperationQUIGLEY-FERNANDEZ, B; MALKIS, F. S; TEDESCHI, J. T et al.British journal of social psychology. 1985, Vol 24, Num 1, pp 29-36, issn 0144-6665Article